Drawing for MURASAKI NAPA VALLEY 2005 PROPRIETARY RED WINE

USPTO serial 79049918

MURASAKI NAPA VALLEY 2005 PROPRIETARY RED WINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3591411Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 2009
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MURASAKI NAPA VALLEY 2005 PROPRIETARY RED WINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerald E. Nagae

Jerald E. Nagae Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Red wine made in Napa Valley, California, USAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 21, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 6, 2018BDFUBIRTH/DEATH MERGER PROCESSED BY USPTO—
Jan 23, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 23, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 29, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 4, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 13, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 15, 2013DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 12, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 6, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance