USPTO serial 79050004
ACTIVE INVERTER TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVE INVERTER TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGG A. PARADISE
GREGG A. PARADISE LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BATTERY CHARGERS; ARC WELDING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL ARC WELDERS NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; LASER WELDING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, LASER WELDING DEVICES NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; FUEL CELLS AND COMPONENTS PARTS THEREOF SOLD TOGETHER AS A UNIT; ELECTRIC WELDING AND CUTTING APPARATUS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC ARC WELDERS AND WELDING ELECTRODES, IN PARTICULAR, MIG-MAG ELECTRIC ARC WELDERS, WIG ELECTRIC ARC WELDERS, AND MANUAL METAL ARC WELDING ELECTRODES AND WELDING TORCHES; WELDING ELECTRODES; CURRENT AND VOLTAGE CONVERTERS, IN PARTICULAR FOR WELDING APPARATUS; POWER SOURCES IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES, IN PARTICULAR INVERTER CURRENT SOURCES IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES; FREQUENCY RECTIFIERS; PLASMA WELDING AND CUTTING POWER SOURCES IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES; TRANSFORMERS; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS AND MODULES FOR CONVERTING ELECTRONIC RADIATION TO ELECTRICAL ENERGY; APPARATUS AND ROBOTS ELECTRICAL MICROPROCESSOR CONTROLLERS FOR ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROGRAMMING MICROPROCESSORS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR VIRTUAL WELDING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION, COMPUTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, AND CONSTRUCTION PLANNING IN THE NATURE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAFTING, ALL PERTAINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF CURRENT SOURCES, APPARATUS, CONTROL SYSTEMS AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, IN PARTICULAR FOR WELDING AND CUTTING APPARATUS, CHARGING APPARATUS, PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND FUEL CELL SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2008 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |