USPTO serial 79050021
NATTA!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3903082Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2011
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATTA!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ranelagh Dublin 6, IE
Ranelagh; Dublin 6, IE
Ranelagh; Dublin 6, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J McAllister
TERRENCE J MCALLISTER OHLANDT GREELEY RUGGIERO & PERLE LLPONE LANDMARK SQUARE10TH FLOORSTAMFORD, CT 06901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, telecommunications access services; mobile telecommunications services, namely, cell phone services; mobile telecommunications network services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, sound and video by means of wireless networks; Internet access services; electronic mail and text messaging services; Internet service providers, namely, electronic transmission and reception of data and of information; support services relating to telecommunications networks and apparatus, namely, telecommunication consultation in the nature of technical consulting in the field of audio, text and visual data transmission and communication; provision of telecommunications access to computer databases and the Internet; electronic transmission of news, information, messages or images; providing telecommunications access to news and information over the Internet and other computer networks; electronic data interchange services; and information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing seminars and workshops in the field of telecommunications; training in the use and operation of computers, data processors, cell phones, MP3 players; interactive entertainment services, namely, children's entertainment centers in the nature of interactive play areas; electronic game services provided by means of communications networks, namely, providing online computer games and rental of computer game software; entertainment and information services provided by means of telecommunication networks, namely, providing information in the fields of entertainment, current event news and sports; and information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIM W.E. Ireland Limited
- Other trademarks owned by TIM W.E. Ireland Limited
- Other trademarks owned by TIM W.E. Ireland Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NATTA!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |