Drawing for SKIN GOOD ENOUGH TO EAT

USPTO serial 79050031

SKIN GOOD ENOUGH TO EAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3557819Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 6, 2009
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKIN GOOD ENOUGH TO EAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANNA ERENBURG

ANNA ERENBURG CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLPONE WORLD FINANCIAL CENTER, 19TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10281UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, creams for facial and body skin care for cosmetic purposes, hair lotions; sun block preparations in the nature of cosmetic preparations for skin care and tanning purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Medical care services; hygiene and beauty care for the face and for the body including massages; beauty salons; balneotherapy and hydrotherapy treatment; hygiene and beauty care with provision of solarium, sauna facilities, hammamSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 17, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 6, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 7, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 7, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 31, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 7, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance