Drawing for PLASMA WAFER

USPTO serial 79050048

PLASMA WAFER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLASMA WAFER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Silicon wafers for solar cells; semiconductor wafers, namely, compound semiconductor wafers, SOI (Silicon-On-Insulator) wafers, and strained silicon wafers; semiconductor silicon wafers; single-crystal silicon wafers; ingots of semiconductor silicon for making silicon wafers; single-crystal silicon ingots for integrated circuitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 2, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 13, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 13, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 12, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance