USPTO serial 79050078
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
E-36201 Vigo, ES
E-36201 Vigo, ES
E-36201 Vigo, ES
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Franklin Rothwell
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PCSUITE 8001425 K STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FISH; SEAFOOD, NOT LIVE; EDIBLE MOLLUSKS, NOT LIVE | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING; COMMERCIAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; OFFICE FUNCTIONS; RETAIL OUTLETS FEATURING FISH, SEAFOOD, NOT LIVE, EDIBLE MOLLUSKS, NOT LIVE | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION OF FISH, SHELLFISH, NOT LIVE, EDIBLE MOLLUSKS, NOT LIVE | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 6, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |