Drawing for PARKSAFE

USPTO serial 79050101

PARKSAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3598650Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 31, 2009
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARKSAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Scott

James L. Scott Warner Norcross & Judd LLP111 Lyon Street NW900 Fifth Third CenterGrand Rapids, MI 49503-2487

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Cooking appliances, namely, hot plates, electric outdoor grills, gas grills, electric cooking ovens, baking ovens; barbeque grills; gas and electric cooking appliances, namely, gas cook tops and electric cook topsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 27, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 6, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance