Drawing for EMMINENT

USPTO serial 79050105

EMMINENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3587330Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 2009
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMMINENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Yoghurt-based beveragesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, flavoured with yoghurtSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 17, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 17, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 16, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 17, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 16, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 31, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 25, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 4, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance