USPTO serial 79050161
ATODIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATODIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. BRETT HEAVNER
B. Brett Heavner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; providing office functions; business consultancy in the form of services involving information search and retrieval; services relating to media clippings; compilation, systemization and input of information in databases; processing, storage, compilation and supervision of computer information; data search in computer files for others, namely, analyzing data from computer files for retrieving media information; database management, computerized register management, computerized and central file management and data management for use in retrieving and analysis of media information; e-commerce in the form of providing information about products via telecommunications networks for advertising and sales purposes; invoicing; commercial information; arranging subscriptions to information media packages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications, namely, telecommunication access services; computer-aided transmission of database information, messages and images; digital transmission and transmission via the Internet of voice, data images, signals and messages; communication via portals for obtaining information, namely, information transmission via electronic communication networks; message sending via electronic media; sending of video films, namely, streaming of video material on the Internet; providing access to databases and data networks; wireless access point WAP communications, namely, by mobile phones and computers; transmission and sending of database information via telecommunications networks; communications services for providing information, text, sound, images and data via communications and data networks, namely, electronic transmission of information, text, sound, images and data via communications and data network; data services, namely, providing access to data networks for transmission and dissemination of information; consultancy, information and advisory services in the field of telecommunications; transmission of text, messages, information, sound and images via communications and data networks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer consultancy; computer programming; design, development, updating and maintenance of databases, computer software, webpages, websites and computer systems; consultancy relating to computer databases, computer software and computer systems; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; scanning of documents; providing space on webservers and websites, namely, webhosting services; rental of webservers; data conversion of electronic computer information; conversion of data or documents from one digital format to another; data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |