Drawing for DBF DOPPIABASE FRUTTA

USPTO serial 79050162

DBF DOPPIABASE FRUTTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3673119Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 25, 2009
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DBF DOPPIABASE FRUTTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne and Schwab666 Third Avenue 10th FloorNew York, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bases, consisting of sugar, dextrose, stabilizer, flavor, color, vegetable fat, emulsifier, protein and vegetable protein for making ice-creams, flavored ices, fruit ice, Italian style ice creams, frozen confections, frozen custards, frozen yogurt, ice milk, parfaits, sherbet and sorbet, all for commercial and industrial useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2021INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 6, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 31, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 31, 2020C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 3, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 1, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 1, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 4, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 24, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 20, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 31, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 28, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance