USPTO serial 79050189
SEA CRYPSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEA CRYPSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia L. Werner
Patricia L. Werner Bryan Cave LLP1290 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, nautical, surveying apparatus and instruments; sonars; sonar equipment; apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers; computer software; computers; magnetic data media; detectors; detectors for military purposes; encoders; electronic apparatus and equipment for defence purposes; torpedo defence systems; lasers; computer monitors; naval signalling apparatus; navigational instruments and apparatus; apparatus for use in guidance of weapons and missiles; electronic guidance controls for detecting and sensing purposes; encryption apparatus for use in weapons guidance systems; missile guidance systems; protection devices against sonar and radar; radios, radar apparatus; audio and video receivers; remote control apparatus; electronic signal transmitters; telecommunication transmitters; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 013 | Ammunition; projectiles; ballistic weapons; missiles; torpedos; rocket launchers; signal rockets; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |