USPTO serial 79050252
SIGMACLAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3591418Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SIGMACLAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
Solingen, DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine F. Hoffman
Catherine F. Hoffman Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell, & Berkowitz, PC200 East Broward Blvd, Suite 2000FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Container for household and kitchen use not of precious metal; frying pans; non electric pressure cookers; lids for pots; stew-pans; cookery moulds; cooking pot sets; cauldrons; cooking pots; lids for pans, non-electric pressure cookers, and woks; pots; woks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. Henckels AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. Henckels AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. Henckels AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. Henckels AG
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SIGMACLAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |