USPTO serial 79050281
SLIDE-IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3591421Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLIDE-IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith W. Medansky
Keith W. Medansky DLA Piper LLP (US)P.O. Box 64807Chicago, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Boxes of paper or cardboard for image and sound carriers, and magnetic data carriers, including CDs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Storage and organization systems comprising trays, holders for trays and multi-disc boxes for storing image and sound carriers and magnetic data carriers in the nature of CDs and DVDs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of storage systems for image and sound carriers and magnetic data carriers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PaperFoam Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PaperFoam Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PaperFoam Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SLIDE-IT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |