USPTO serial 79050328
ZIEBELIZING GLOBAL RESERVOIRS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIEBELIZING GLOBAL RESERVOIRS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction; repair; installation services; drilling of wells and bore holes; installation and maintenance of water, oil or gas pipes; maintenance of wells; underwater construction; underwater repair; services related to completion services, in the nature of building and installation services, and overhauling services, in the nature of maintenance and repair services, namely completion of and overhauling of wellbores and of oil, gas, water and geothermal wells | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; geological prospecting; geological surveys; engineering; analysis for oil field and gas field exploitation; well testing, namely, oil well testing and gas well testing, providing data in relation to wellbore inspection, measuring and logging of wells; production logging | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |