USPTO serial 79050342
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
COLCERESA (VI), IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Alexander Nolte
N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach Siegel1 Chase RoadScarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ PROTECTION DEVICES FOR PERSONAL USE AGAINST ACCIDENTS, NAMELY, BACK PADDING AND GUARDS, NECK PADDING AND GUARDS, CHEST PADDING AND GUARDS, KNEE PADS AND GUARDS, ELBOW PADS AND GUARDS, LIFE BELTS, LIFE JACKETS; SPECTACLES, SUNGLASSES, SPECTACLE CASES, LENSES FOR SPECTACLES, SPECTACLE FRAMES, SPECTACLES CHAINS; PROTECTIVE HELMETS FOR SPORTS; PROTECTIVE HELMETS; PROTECTIVE HELMETS FOR MOTORCYCLISTS, CYCLISTS AND MOTORISTS; PROTECTIVE GLASSES FOR SPORTS; GOGGLES FOR SPORTS; PROTECTIVE SPECTACLES AND GOGGLES FOR MOTORCYCLISTS, ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED FOR MOTORCYCLISTS AND SOLD EXCLUSIVELY IN MOTORCYCLING SHOPS AND IN MOTORCYCLING ACCESSORIES' SHOPS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | [ RUCKSACKS FOR MOTORCYCLISTS; SPORTS BAGS FOR MOTORCYCLISTS, TOTE BAGS FOR MOTORCYCLISTS, KNAPSACKS FOR MOTORCYCLISTS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | [ MOTORCYCLIST GLOVES AND ] MOTORCYCLIST BOOTS, [ ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED FOR ] MOTORCYCLISTS AND SOLD EXCLUSIVELY IN MOTORCYCLING SHOPS AND IN MOTORCYCLING ACCESSORIES' SHOPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | [ SHIN PADS AND GUARDS, BEING SPORTS ARTICLES FOR MOTORCYCLING USE; KNEE PADS AND GUARDS, BEING SPORTS ARTICLES FOR MOTORCYCLING USE; PROTECTIVE SUPPORTS FOR SHOULDERS AND ELBOWS, BEING SPORTS ARTICLES FOR MOTORCYCLING USE, ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED FOR MOTORCYCLISTS AND SOLD EXCLUSIVELY IN MOTORCYCLING SHOPS AND IN MOTORCYCLING ACCESSORIES' SHOPS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 27, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |