USPTO serial 79050371
CHATEAU LYNCH-BAGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3576422Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2009
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CHATEAU LYNCH-BAGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines of guaranteed label of origin from the estate called Château Lynch-Bages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |