Drawing for DURUKAN GUM MAXI

USPTO serial 79050384

DURUKAN GUM MAXI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURUKAN GUM MAXI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery (fruit jellies, lozenges, candy for food), chocolate, ices; chewing gum (not for medical purposes); honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; iceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 27, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 3, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 20, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 20, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 19, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 14, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 14, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 12, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2008RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Apr 10, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 20, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance