USPTO serial 79050413
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Solar cells; silicon wafers for solar cells; semiconductor wafers, namely, compound semiconductor wafers, SOI (Silicon-On-Insulator) wafers, and strained silicon wafers; semiconductor silicon wafers; single-crystal silicon wafers [; ingots of semiconductor silicon for making silicon wafers; single-crystal silicon ingots for integrated circuits ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2008 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |