USPTO serial 79050438
SOCIETA'
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3712153Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2009
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOCIETA'?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOCIETA TEKSTIL; SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Beyazit, ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETA TEKSTIL; SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
SOCIETA TEKSTIL; SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Beyazit, ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETA TEKSTIL; SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
SOCIETA TEKSTIL; SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Beyazit, ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETA TEKSTIL; SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Jeremy Craft and Andrew W. Chu
L. Jeremy Craft and Andrew W. Chu CRAFT CHU PLLC1204 Heights BoulevardHouston, TX 77008-6918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pullovers; skirts; dresses; blouses; jeans; trousers; jackets; coats, raincoats, anoraks; sportswear, namely, shirts, shorts, pants and jackets; shirts; T-shirts; sweatshirts; beach clothes, namely, bathing suits and beach cover-ups; shorts; knitwear, namely, shirts, shorts, sweaters and scarves; overalls; underclothing; bodices; brassieres; camisoles; underpants; dressing gowns; bath robes; bathing suits; pyjamas; gloves; ski suits; headgear, namely, hats, caps, knitted caps, berets; footwear, namely, shoes excluding orthopaedic shoes, slippers, boots, sandals, beach shoes, sports shoes, lace boots and parts thereof; shoe parts, namely, heelpieces; heels; footwear uppers; stockings; belts; ties; neckties; shawls; scarves; mufflers; neck scarves; sarongs; collars for dresses; maniples; muffs; suspenders; braces for clothing; garters; bandanas; headbands; clothing for babies, namely, babies' diapers of textile | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail clothing store services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETA TEKSTIL; SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETA TEKSTIL; SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETA TEKSTIL; SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SOCIETA'
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |