USPTO serial 79050571
EVAPIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVAPIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, weighing, measuring, checking (supervision) and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; magnetic recording media; recording discs, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, optical discs; calculating machines; data processing and computer equipment; software (recorded programmes); computer programmes | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products neither prepared, nor transformed; grains for animal consumption; groats for poultry; foodstuffs for animals; animal feed supplements; additives to fodder, not for medical purposes; strengthening animal forage; protein for animal consumption | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Updating of databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Valuation services, estimates, research and writing of reports in the fields of science and technology namely expert reports of engineers; analysis and industrial research services; software design and development; installation, updating, rental of computer software; consultancy services with regard to software; maintenance of computer software; computer programming; production (design) of databases; rental of web servers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by METEX NOOVISTAGO
- Other trademarks owned by Eurolysine
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EVAPIG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |