Drawing for NEXTG

USPTO serial 79050609

NEXTG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOONE, JOHN C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXTG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIE-ANNE MASTROVITO

MARIE-ANNE MASTROVITO ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical apparatus for recording, emission, transmission, routing, reception, reproduction and processing of sounds, signals, signs and/or images, namely, telephones, voice over internet protocol telephones, telephones which provide access to on-line telephone directories and high sound qualitySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 15, 2010MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 14, 2010ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 14, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 14, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 17, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 9, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 9, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 29, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 14, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 12, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 17, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 9, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 22, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance