USPTO serial 79050708
STEAMPLICITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3673122Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2009
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEAMPLICITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried, cooked and frozen fruits and vegetables; soups; milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yoghurt; eggs; preserves made with meat, fish, poultry and game; mincemeat; fruit desserts, namely, glazed fruits, fruit crumbles, baked fruits, fruit cocktails; prepared dishes and snack foods made with the above products, namely, fruit-based snack foods, prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; desserts made with milk, milk products and fruit, namely, fruit trifles, yoghurts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Preparations made with flour, namely, flour-based gnocchi, flour-based chips, pasta, flour-based cakes, pancakes; yeast; rusks; processed cereals and cereal preparations, namely, cereal bars, cereal bread, dried breakfast cereals; bread, products made with bread, namely, bread rolls, gingerbread, sandwiches; pastry; bakery products; flours, excluding nut flours; flour-based gnocchi, flour-based chips, pasta, flour-based cakes, pancakes; macaroni, vermicelli, spaghetti, pasta, noodles; pizza; pastry and confectionery, namely, fruit jellies, frozen confectionary, fondants, cakes, candies, pies, chocolates, sweet breads and buns, brioches, croissants; tarts, biscuits, small cakes, cakes, products made or flavoured with chocolate, namely, chocolate bars, chocolate sweets, chocolate candies, chocolate cakes, chocolate sauces, chocolate biscuits and cookies; rice, tapioca; honey and honey substitutes; chocolate spread; salt; mustard; pepper, vinegar; sauces, namely, cheese sauce, hot sauce, pasta sauce, béchamel sauce, barbecue sauce, Bolognese sauce, onion sauce, tomato sauce, mayonnaise, vinaigrette sauce, vinaigrette sauce with chopped boiled eggs, gherkins, capers and herbs, pesto sauce, thin custard made with eggs, caramel, seasoning sauces, pepper sauces; bakery desserts; puddings; frozen desserts consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; pies; spreads made with condiments, namely, mustard, condiment-based spread, anchovy spread, yeast-based spread, ketchup, hummus, horseradish, tapenade, harissa, soya spread; all of the above available as prepared dishes and snack-size foods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruits and vegetables, fresh garden herbs; wheat germ | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink; catering services; take-away restaurant services, namely, preparing and providing prepared, semi-cooked or uncooked take-away dishes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Compass Group Holdings Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Compass Group Holdings Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Compass Group Holdings Plc
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named STEAMPLICITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |