USPTO serial 79050812
GEEKIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3976524Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2011
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEEKIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean S. Swidler
SEAN S SWIDLER IPHORGAN LTD1130 LAKE COOK ROADSUITE 240BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laptop computer bags; carrying cases for cables; * computer carrying cases; * carriers and bags for storing and carrying compact discs, DVD's, computers and audio- visual apparatus; cases for photographic apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | LNNX | LIMITATION HAS NO EFFECT PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 10, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |