USPTO serial 79050898
SB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; shampoos; cosmetic balms, oils, ointments, creams, powders and lotions; massage oil; preparations for baths not included in other classes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary preparations; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food, food supplements and food concentrates (also in the form of pills, tablets, capsules and powders) for medical and dietetic (health) purposes; medicinal drinks; cough pastilles and throat pastilles; vitamin preparations; mineral and vitamin food preparations for medical use; plasters, materials for dressings; materials for stopping teeth, dental wax; disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OJG Consumer Care B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Novum Pharma Singapore Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by D.J. van Tintelen Beheer B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |