USPTO serial 79050936
SOLEMIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLEMIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J. McAllister
Terrence J. McAllister Ohlandt, Greeley, Ruggiero & Perle, LLPOne Landmark Square10th FloorStamford, CT 06901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely telecommunications access services; mobile telecommunications services, namely, cell phone services; telecommunications portal services, namely, entry/exit security portal comprised of an electronic passageway equipped with biometric devices for identification verification and detection of impermissible items being carried through; mobile telecommunications network services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, sound and video by means of wireless networks; Internet access services; electronic mail and text messaging services; Internet service providers, namely, electronic transmission and reception of data and of information; support services relating to telecommunications networks and apparatus, namely, telecommunication consultation in the nature of technical consulting in the field of audio, text and visual data transmission and communication; provision of telecommunications access to computer databases and the Internet; electronic transmission of news, information, messages or images; providing telecommunications access to news and information over the Internet and other computer networks; electronic data interchange services; and information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing seminars and workshops in the field of telecommunications; training in the use and operation of computers, data processors, cell phones, MP3 players; entertainment in the nature of recorded and live comedy and musical acts, and sporting events; interactive entertainment services, namely children's entertainment centers in the nature of interactive play areas; electronic game services provided by means of communications networks, namely, providing recorded and online computer games; entertainment and information services provided by means of telecommunication networks, namely, providing information in the field of entertainment, news, sports, finance; sporting and cultural services, namely, organizing exhibitions for educational, cultural, sporting, or entertainment purpose, provision of education, entertainment and information services for mobile and cell phones through the Internet and by means of television, namely, entertainment in the nature of television news shows, musical events, cultural events and sports events; and information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |