USPTO serial 79050949
POSH FASHIONATION LIFESTYLE AGENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3635472Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2009
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSH FASHIONATION LIFESTYLE AGENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Carpets, rugs, mats and matting and linoleum for covering existing floors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POSH CONSULTING bvba
- Other trademarks owned by POSH CONSULTING bvba
- Other trademarks owned by POSH CONSULTING bvba
- Other trademarks owned by Posh Fashionation BVBA
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named POSH FASHIONATION LIFESTYLE AGENCY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 12, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |