USPTO serial 79050961
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BROUWERIJ HAACHT in het frans BRASSERIE HAACHT, naamloze venootschap
BE
Other trademarks owned by BROUWERIJ HAACHT in het frans BRASSERIE HAACHT, naamloze venootschap
BRASSERIE HAACHT, in het nederlands:; BROUWERIJ HAACHT, Naamloze; vennootschap
BE
BRASSERIE HAACHT, in het nederlands:; BROUWERIJ HAACHT, Naamloze; vennootschap
BE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Lemonades, table waters | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |