Drawing for SCOF

USPTO serial 79050962

SCOF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3616196Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 5, 2009
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SCOF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeannine A Rittenhouse

Jeannine A Rittenhouse IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights RoadSuite 125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006[ Metal handles for table cutlery ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008Cutlery, namely, knives, forks and spoonsACTIVE—
020[ Wooden handles for table cutlery and plastic handles for table cutlery ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2026CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2026LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 13, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 10, 2025LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 6, 2020INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 13, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 13, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 6, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 5, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 24, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 18, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 7, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 18, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 18, 201571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
May 18, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 30, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 5, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 18, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance