USPTO serial 79050986
SCHÖNLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3718690Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 2009
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCHÖNLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ALTINDAG ALÜMINYUM METAL; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ALTINDAG ALÜMINYUM METAL; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ALTINDAG ALÜMINYUM METAL; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ALTINDAG ALÜMINYUM METAL; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ALTINDAG POLIMER VE METAL SANAYI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Silivri - Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by ALTINDAG POLIMER VE METAL SANAYI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1314 Texas, 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal building materials, namely, non-metal windows, non-metal doors, non-metal window and door casings, and non-metal rigid pipes for building; asphalt, pitch and bitumen; non-metal transportable buildings; and non-metal monuments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALTINDAG ALÜMINYUM METAL; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by ALTINDAG ALÜMINYUM METAL; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by ALTINDAG POLIMER VE METAL SANAYI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named SCHÖNLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 8, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 6, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |