USPTO serial 79051012
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CY
Task Force Properties & Investments Ltd
GB
Other trademarks owned by Task Force Properties & Investments Ltd
Task Force Properties & Investments Ltd
GB
Other trademarks owned by Task Force Properties & Investments Ltd
Task Force Properties & Investments Ltd
GB
Other trademarks owned by Task Force Properties & Investments Ltd
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rodney L. Skoglund
RODNEY L. SKOGLUND RENNER KENNER GREIVE BOBAK TAYLOR & WEBE4th FLOORFIRST NATIONAL TOWERAKRON, OH 44308| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Sporting articles, namely, protective pads and guards for use in contact sports; shin guards and shin pads for use in contact sports; shin guards and shin pads for use in soccer; ankle protectors for use in contact sports; achilles tendon protectors for use in contact sports; knee guards for use in contact sports; elbow guards for use in contact sports; balls for use in sports; soccer balls | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |