Drawing for MIX-FIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP M.F.C. M-1

USPTO serial 79051018

MIX-FIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP M.F.C. M-1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MIX-FIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP M.F.C. M-1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Videotaping, physical education, organizations of sports competitions; television entertainment; providing sports facilities; providing amusement arcade services; timing of sports events; videotape film production; rental of sports equipment, except vehicles; sport camp servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 1, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 25, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance