Drawing for POPHAM DESIGN

USPTO serial 79051039

POPHAM DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POPHAM DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
019Wall tilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
020FurnitureSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 24, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 29, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 21, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 10, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 10, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 22, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 10, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance