USPTO serial 79051085
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ann Arbor MI, US
64569 Nauheim, DE
64569 Nauheim, DE
64569 Nauheim, DE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | [ Weaponry cases, ammunition belts, weapon sheaths, rifle slings; ammunition cases ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 015 | Cases, sheaths and boxes for musical instruments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | [ Cases, in particular valises, travelling trunks, attaché cases, briefcases, vanity cases sold empty, suitcases, travelling bags, beach bags, hunters' game bags, rucksacks, billfolds, credit and business card cases, key cases, garment bags for travel, shoulder bags, handbags, salespersons' sample cases, clutch bags for ladies, purses, waist bags, haversacks, bags for sports, shoe cases for travel, luggage straps, luggage bags ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |