USPTO serial 79051106
DEGRADAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3692671Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2009
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEGRADAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K STREET NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Nanoparticled additive for plastic matrixes in the nature of artificial resins, chemicals used in industry, chemical additives | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Nanoparticles in the nature of a chemical additive to promote biodegradability sold as a component part of semi-processed plastics, resins to promote biodegradability of plastic matrixes in extruded form for general industrial use, semi-worked plastic resins to promote biodegradability of plastic matrixes sold as a component part of semi-finished products in form of pellets, rods, foils, foams, fibers, film, and sheets and plastic additives in the nature of a chemical additive to promote biodegradability sold as a component part of semi-processed plastics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NANOBIOMATTERS, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by NANOBIOMATTERS, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by NANOBIOMATTERS, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named DEGRADAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |