USPTO serial 79051166
GROUW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GROUW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Garden tools (hand-operated) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |