Drawing for REVOLUTIONARY SHIN PROTECTION

USPTO serial 79051176

REVOLUTIONARY SHIN PROTECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3616207Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 5, 2009
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REVOLUTIONARY SHIN PROTECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney L. Skoglund

Rodney L. Skoglund Renner Kenner Greive Bobak Taylor & WeberFourth Floor, First National TowerAkron, OH 44308UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Sporting articles, namely, shin guards and shin pads for use in contact sports; shin guards and shin pads for use in soccer; ankle protectors for use in contact sports; achilles tendon protectors for use in contact sports; knee guards for use in contact sports; elbow guards for use in contact sports; balls for use in sports; soccer ballsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 4, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 16, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 11, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 11, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 14, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 5, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 15, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance