Drawing for Serial No. 79051182

USPTO serial 79051182

Serial No. 79051182

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79051182?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM J. SAPONE

WILLIAM J. SAPONE COLEMAN SUDOL SAPONE P.C.714 COLORADO AVENUEBRIDGEPORT, CT 06605UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Playing cardsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 14, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 25, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 24, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 26, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 20, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 20, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance