Drawing for BIO-SYNERGY SKINNY

USPTO serial 79051293

BIO-SYNERGY SKINNY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIO-SYNERGY SKINNY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Oliver E. Todd, Jr.

Oliver E. Todd, Jr. MacMillan, Sobanski & Todd, LLCOne Maritime Plaza, 5th FloorToledo, OH 43604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements for medical purposes, used by active people and for weight managementABANDONED—
032Sports drinks, isotonic drinksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 14, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 23, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 25, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 25, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 25, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 15, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 22, 2009OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2009OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jan 1, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance