Drawing for CS

USPTO serial 79051302

CS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3654867Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 14, 2009
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren Sklar

Warren Sklar Remmer, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar LLP1621 Euclid AvenueThe Keith Building 19th FLCLEVELAND, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010[ artificial limbs; ] orthopedic articles * for external use, * namely, [ belts, ] braces, orthoses for all parts of the body, orthotics for the support of the feet, corsets and supports; [ trusses ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 28, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 9, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 19, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 19, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2009CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 4, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 23, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 23, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 2009LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2009CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 12, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 12, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 28, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance