Drawing for SQUAP

USPTO serial 79051317

SQUAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3734339Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 5, 2010
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SQUAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura Ernst Schwartz

Laura Ernst Schwartz Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center, 22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Sports bagsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, sweater, dresses, pants, shorts, tracksuit, headband, sweatband, swimming trunks, swimming costume, cap, socksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
028Action skill game comprising game playing equipment in the nature of backboards, bags especially designed for sports equipment, balls for games, balls for sport, ball cages,ball buckets, ball gloves, ball holders, ball hoops, ball mitts, ball nets, ball pitching machines, bases, court lines, foam balls, nets as sports articles, play wands in International Class 028SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 5, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 5, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 5, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 29, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 5, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 18, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance