USPTO serial 79051325
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara J Grahn
Barbara J Grahn Fox Rothschild LLP222 South Ninth StreetSuite 2000Minneapolis, MN 55402| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations for the manufacture of technical ceramics; ceramic glazes; compounds of ceramics for sintering in the form of granulates and dry powders | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | [ Material for stopping teeth, dental wax; ] dental mastics, dental lacquer [, adhesives for dentures; porcelain for dentures ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | [ Dental apparatus and instruments, namely, dental mirrors and dental chairs; artificial eyes and teeth; dentures, pins for artificial teeth; braces for teeth; suture materials ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | [ Potters' clay ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |