Drawing for LAURENT-PERRIER, DEPUIS 1812 SINCE, LAURENT-PERRIER, CHAMPAGNE, CHAMPAGNE, 1998, GRAND SIECLE, ALEXANDRA, BRUT, 750 ML, ROSE, 12% VOL., PRODUCE OF FRANCE, ELABORE PAR LAURENT-PERRIER TOURS-SUR-MARNE FRANCE, NM-235-001

USPTO serial 79051376

LAURENT-PERRIER, DEPUIS 1812 SINCE, LAURENT-PERRIER, CHAMPAGNE, CHAMPAGNE, 1998, GRAND SIECLE, ALEXANDRA, BRUT, 750 ML, ROSE, 12% VOL., PRODUCE OF FRANCE, ELABORE PAR LAURENT-PERRIER TOURS-SUR-MARNE FRANCE, NM-235-001

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3635477Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 9, 2009
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAURENT-PERRIER, DEPUIS 1812 SINCE, LAURENT-PERRIER, CHAMPAGNE, CHAMPAGNE, 1998, GRAND SIECLE, ALEXANDRA, BRUT, 750 ML, ROSE, 12% VOL., PRODUCE OF FRANCE, ELABORE PAR LAURENT-PERRIER TOURS-SUR-MARNE FRANCE, NM-235-001?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brewster Taylor

Brewster Taylor STITES & HARBISON PLLCSUITE 3251800 DIAGONAL ROADALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines with Champagne protected label of originSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2021XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2021XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 14, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 22, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 22, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 17, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance