Drawing for CPM

USPTO serial 79051379

CPM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CPM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Household or kitchen utensils and containers; combs and sponges; brushes (except paint brushes); brush-making materials; articles for cleaning purposes; steelwool; unworked or semi-worked glass (except glass used in building); glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Services for providing food and drink; temporary accomodationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 17, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 22, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 12, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 6, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 16, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance