USPTO serial 79051419
CHROMFOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3689492Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2009
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHROMFOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Paper making machines, namely, machines for manufacturing paper; machine transmission gears, especially hydraulic cylinder pistons for machines; marine diesel engines for machines and ships; hydraulic and pneumatic engines for machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, refrigerating and drying purposes for power plants, namely, solar collectors, energy storage plants, solar energy based cooling apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of power plants | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Service in the field of treatment of metals for engineering plating, namely, application of protective coatings, applying protective coatings to metals and carbon fiber products, and installation, maintenance and repair of protective coatings for roof | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Transport by ferry, boat, rail and air | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Hard chromium plating, surface treatment and coating of metals; metal processing, namely, galvanizing; consultancy in the field of treatment of metals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design in the field of treatment of metals used in machines, namely, design of machine parts and mechanical and micromechanical components, engine restoration design services, hydraulic engineering and design, industrial design, tool management system design services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stratum Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Stratum Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Stratum Oy
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHROMFOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |