Drawing for SIEGMUND

USPTO serial 79051421

SIEGMUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3708782Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 10, 2009
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SIEGMUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ursula B. Day

Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day35 West 35th StreetSuite 900New York, NY 10001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools, namely, welding benches for use in welding work pieces; machine tools in the nature of clamping tables for clamping work of all kinds, namely, clamping tables for use with metal working and their components being parts of the welding benches and clamping tables, namely, clamps squares, clamping rails, clamping bridges, stops and boltsACTIVE—
008Hand tools, namely, clamps and screw clamps; hand tools, namely, stop wrenches, combination squares, angular screw plated, squares and clamping boltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 15, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 8, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 4, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 4, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 21, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 10, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 10, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 28, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance