Drawing for LUBITEL

USPTO serial 79051429

LUBITEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUBITEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Photographic cameras, stands for photographic cameras, optical lenses, filters for photographic purposes, shutter releases for cameras, adaptors for medium format cameras for the use of miniature films, underwater casings for camerasSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
016Printed matter and bookbinding material, especially books, postcards, notebooks and albums, photographs, office requisites (except furniture)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Bags, not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 18, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 19, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 9, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 22, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance