Drawing for CARMEN ULTIME

USPTO serial 79051486

CARMEN ULTIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3692677Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 6, 2009
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARMEN ULTIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff

Laurel V. Dineff Dineff Trademark Law Limited160 N. Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair lotions; hair creams; hair gels; hair sprays; hair mousses; hair-styling products, namely, styling wax, styling gels, styling lotions, styling hair creams, styling hair foam, styling mousse, styling clay, styling hair mask, styling paste, styling balsam, emollients, lacquers, hair pomades, sculpting gel, cosmetic hair balms; hair curling products, namely, hair lotions, hair sprays, hair mousses, styling hair foams; shampoos; brilliantines; hair fixers; hair colorants; perming products and their neutralizers, namely, permanent wave preparations and their neutralizers; hair straightening preparations and their neutralizers; products for hair and scalp hygiene not for medical use, namely, shampoos, conditioners, hair styling masks; hair bleaching and hair lightening preparations; hair coloring preparationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 20, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 6, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 13, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 13, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 6, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 18, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 10, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance