USPTO serial 79051493
ISCHIKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3619526Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 12, 2009
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISCHIKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
SK
AT
AT
AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roxana A. Sullivan
Roxana A. Sullivan Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC.120 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1400Chicago, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for [ women, ] men and children, namely, suits, [ coats, ] waterproof clothing, namely, waterproof jackets, waterproof coats: [ jackets, trousers, jeans, shirts, smocks, skirts, ] corsets, jogging outfits for sports, underwear; fabric garments, namely, [ fabric belts, fabric shirts, fabric pants, ] fabric socks; knitted fabric garments, namely, [ knitted fabric belts, knitted fabric shirts, knitted fabric pants, ] knitted fabric socks; knitwear, namely, [ knit shirts, knitted caps, ] knitted underwear [, knitted sweaters ]; fashionable women's outerclothing, namely, [ women's coats, women's jackets, ] hats [ and scarves ]; singlets, [ jumpers, knit shirts; ] accessories, namely, mufflers, belts; footwear, hosiery, boots, training shoes and slippers; headgear, namely, hats, caps, headscarves; bath robes, swimsuits, bathing trunks, bikinis; neckties, scarves; breathable impregnated clothing articles, namely, breathable shirts, hats, pants, and socks; leisure and sportswear articles, namely, shirts, pants, socks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MOM Vertriebs GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by OPRO, k.s.
- Other trademarks owned by Ischiko Mode-Design GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Ischiko Mode-Design GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Ischiko Mode-Design GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ISCHIKO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| May 7, 2016 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 3, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |