USPTO serial 79051582
MIRADOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3570253Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2009
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRADOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Geza C. Ziegler Jr.
GEZA C. ZIEGLER JR. Ziegler IP Law Group, LLC55 Greens Farms RoadSynergy SuiteWestport, CT 06880Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, [ tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca, sago; ] artificial coffee, [ flour and cereal products; namely, flour for food; cereal products for food, namely, oat flakes, groats in the nature of processed grains, processed semolina, breakfast cereals; bread; confectionery, namely, hard candies, filled candies, chocolate covered fruit, chocolate covered nuts, chocolates, fondants; ice-cream; sweets; honey; yeast extracts; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces, flavourings other than essential oils, for cakes and for beverages, ] drinks on the base of coffee, [ tea, cocoa or chocolate, ] namely, coffee based beverages [, beverages made of tea, cocoa based beverages, chocolate beverages not being dairy based or vegetable based; pastry; cakes; cookies; flavors for drinks and flavors for pastry, namely, flavor enhancers used in food and beverage oroducts; candies; coffee aromas, namely, coffee extracts; vegetal preparations for use as coffee substitutes; ketchup; biscuits; wafers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ Substances for drinks production, namely, syrups for making soft drinks; alcohol-free drinks, namely, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; tablets for effervescent drinks, namely, concentrates used in the preparation of soft drinks; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, beer; tomato juice; fruit juices; waters charged with gas and mineral, namely, mineral and carbonated waters; vegetable juices] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INSTANTA Sp. z o.o.
- Other trademarks owned by INSTANTA Sp. z o.o.
- Other trademarks owned by INSTANTA Sp. z o.o.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MIRADOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 11, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |