USPTO serial 79051588
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; unprocessed artificial resins; chemical substances for preserving and curing foodstuffs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | Preservatives against deterioration of wood | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations; sanitary preparations for medical purposes; plasters, material for dressings; disinfectants; fungicides; herbicides | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |